Graduate outcome frameworks and professional accreditation bodies require evidence of authentic skill development. We generate that evidence automatically — at the granularity of individual students, individual criteria, and individual milestones.
Australian Computer Society
The ACS CBOK defines what ICT professionals need to know and do. Our platform operationalises the professional practice dimensions — making them assessable, measurable, and reportable at scale.
Requirements traceability, test design, and iterative delivery are assessed directly through issue management, milestone completion, and test coverage trends.
Code review participation, PR description quality, and peer feedback engagement are scored per student — making collaboration a measurable outcome, not an assumption.
Commit discipline, branching practices, CI ownership, and deadline management are the operational definition of professional conduct in software engineering.
Automated cross-repo similarity detection via JPlag provides systematic, evidence-based integrity checking across the full cohort at every milestone.
Engineers Australia
Engineers Australia requires graduates to demonstrate engineering application ability and professional attributes. Our platform provides objective, per-student evidence against six Stage 1 competencies.
Students are assessed on fluent use of version control, CI/CD pipelines, code review workflows, and issue tracking — the toolchain of professional software engineering.
Milestone planning, task decomposition, and incremental delivery are scored per student, providing evidence of systematic project management practice.
Academic integrity detection and individual contribution tracking ensure that each student is accountable for their own demonstrated practice.
Commit message quality, PR descriptions, and code review comments are analysed for clarity, specificity, and professional register.
Commit distribution patterns, deadline behaviour, and consistent engagement over the semester provide objective evidence of self-management.
Per-student review activity, responsiveness to feedback, and contribution equity within teams surface the individual dynamics that team grades conceal.
Graduate Outcome Frameworks
Threshold Learning Outcomes and graduate attribute frameworks require evidence that students have developed, not just been exposed to, professional competencies. We close the gap between curriculum intent and assessment reality.
“Our platform operationalises what good software engineering education has always aimed at: authentic assessment of professional practice, at scale, with evidence that satisfies both internal quality assurance and external accreditation requirements.”
Software engineering TLOs require students to demonstrate application of professional methods and tools. Our rubric maps directly to these outcomes — every criterion is traceable to a TLO.
TEQSA requires evidence of student learning outcomes at the unit level. Our per-milestone, per-criterion, per-student data provides the granularity that annual reporting demands.
Attributes like professional responsibility, teamwork, and lifelong learning are often assessed anecdotally. We make them measurable through git-level behavioural evidence.
Aggregate criterion performance data reveals where the curriculum is working and where it is not — enabling evidence-driven curriculum review rather than intuition-based adjustment.
Quality Assurance
Every claim is backed by a timestamped, auditable record from the student's own repository.
Every score is backed by a git-level evidence trail — commit hashes, PR timestamps, CI run IDs. Defensible, auditable, and ready for panel review.
Criterion-level pass rates, grade distributions, and milestone trend data support annual unit reviews, accreditation self-studies, and curriculum improvement cycles.
Automated rubric application eliminates inter-marker variability. Every student in the cohort is assessed against the same criteria with the same rigour.
Cohort performance data exports in structured formats suitable for submission to ACS, Engineers Australia, TEQSA, or internal quality assurance committees.
We will walk you through how our platform maps to your specific accreditation requirements and generate a sample evidence report from your own course data.
Book a 30-min DemoInstitutional and faculty licensing available.